Danaher

"The company Danaher has set a net zero target of reducing its Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by 50.4% on an absolute basis by 2032, compared to a baseline year of 2021. Net Zero Tracker
This reduction target aligns with the climate science goal of limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels. Net Zero Tracker
An interesting fact about Danaher's environmental policy is that it also includes an interim target of reducing emissions by 15.0% relative to 2019 emissions by 2024. Net Zero Tracker
In addition, you can check out the net-zero commitments and …"

Current Score (vs. LY)

19.1 pts (-4.0)

Last Update: Nov. 24, 2024

Current Rankings

Global: #317

S&P100: #96

Health Care: #40

40.0%

Transparency

Quality of climate reporting based on public disclosures, completeness and verification of GHG emissions

17.7%

Commitments

Level of ambition through gross absolute emissions reduction and 'net zero' targets

0.0%

Results

Results and actions to deliver on commitments for real

Greenhouse Gas Emissions

Last 3 Years Emissions Data Summary

Y2021Y2020Y2019
Scope 1 155,974141,040138,341
Scope 2 - location-based 216,493208,642198,220
Scope 2 - market-based 226,042233,726219,166
Scope 1-2 - location-based 372,467349,682336,561
Scope 1-2 - market-based 382,016 374,766 357,507
Scope 3 000
Total - location-based 372,467349,682336,561
Total - market-based 382,016 374,766 357,507

Note: Data sources detailed here

Y2022
Total CO2e estimate (by Net0Tracker) 1,899,000
Methodology Pre-calculated sector intensity (revenue)

Carbon emissions are estimated according to comparable years, intensity and sector benchmarks

Performance vs. Target

380k140k140k160k220k230k230k190kBaseline(Y2021)Y2019Y2020Y20212022...2031Target(Y2032)050k100k150k200k250k300k350k400k
Operational EmissionsEmissions (in tons of CO​2​e)Objective-50.4% vs. 2021
Note: Targets without baseline are ignored. In case several targets exist, only the shorter-term target is displayed.


Value Chain (scope 3) Emissions by Category


Scope 3 Emissions not available

Emissions Trajectory (Full Scopes)

2019202020212022202320242025202620272028202920302031203220332034203520362037203820392040204120422043204420452046204720482049205000.5M1M1.5M2M2.5M
GHG Emissions TrajectoryDanaherGHG Emissions


Please refer to the library for viewing the supporting documentation

Despite our best efforts to report accurate data based on publicly-available information, some data may be wrong, inaccurate or outdated. If it is the case, please reach out and report the issues. Email

Sector Benchmark

Eurofins ScientificMedtronicBayerMerckAgilent TechnologiesSartoriusHenry ScheinAstraZenecaElevance HealthMerck & Co.RegeneronMcKessonGSK plcCatalentAbbVie Inc.IlluminaAbbott LaboratoriesHumanaJohnson & JohnsonGilead Sciences Inc.QiagenEssilorLuxotticaSanofiPfizer Inc.ZoetisAmgen Inc.Bristol Myers SquibbBecton DickinsonCharles River LaboratoriesBoston ScientificBiogen Inc.CignaVertex PharmaceuticalsUnited Health GroupThermo Fisher ScientificResMedEli LillyMettler ToledoDanaherSiemens HealthineersEdwards LifesciencesCVS HealthStryker CorporationBaxter International Inc.IQVIA54321M98765432100k9876543210k2345678910B23456789100B234
102030405060Intensity BenchmarkSector: Health Carehigh----------Scope1+2 Emissions----------lowRevenue

Note: Latest GHG and revenue data (based on tradingview.com) are used to calculate GHG emissions intensity by sector. The color scale of each bubble depends on the GHG intensity (GHG emissions per 1 million USD revenue). Sectors follow the Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS) that organize companies based on their primary business activities. The 11 sectors are : Information Technology, Health Care, Financials, Consumer Discretionary, Communication Services, Industrials, Consumer Staples, Energy, Utilities, Real Estate, and Materials.

Danaher belongs to the sector Health Care.

Despite our best efforts to report accurate data based on publicly-available information, some data may be wrong, inaccurate or outdated. If it is the case, please reach out and report the issues. Email

Reduction and Net Zero Targets

>Note: intensity targets are not represented in the current version - see Methodology

Gross Absolute Emission Reductions


Net Absolute Emission Reductions

There is no absolute emission reduction recorded in our database. Email us to report missing information Email


Net Zero Future Commitments

There is no net zero target recorded in our database. Email us to report missing information Email


Science-based Targets (SBTI)

Date Published / Updated :01/02/2024

Near-term Long-Term Net Zero Standard
Committed No target Yes
Data source: SBTI

Despite our best efforts to report accurate data based on publicly-available information, some data may be wrong, inaccurate or outdated. If it is the case, please reach out and report the issues. Email

Offsets

Last update for Danaher by zerotracker.net: Sept. 4, 2024
Planning to use external offset credits Not Specified
Separate targets for emission reductions and removals No
Conditions on use of offset credits None
Plans for carbon dioxide removal (CDR) Not Specified

Data source from zerotracker.net - For more information, see methodology

Score Summary

RefPrinciple Score
(points) 		Max
(points) 		Delta
(points)
1 At least 2 years of GHG emissions for scope 1 and 2 are publicly-available and externally-verified 5.0 10.0 0.0
2 Scope 3 emissions are fully reported and externally-verified 0.0 10.0 0.0
3 CDP score demonstrates the level of transparent disclosures 7.0 10.0 1.0
Transparency 12.0 30.0 1.0
4 Net Zero Commitments by 2050 include an intermediate target and cover all the emissions 0.0 10.0 0.0
5 Net Zero targets demonstrate a high-level of emergency 0.0 10.0 0.0
6 Emission reduction targets on a forward-looking basis are ambitious 4.6 10.0 0.0
7 Targets are science-based as validated by SBTi 2.5 10.0 2.5
Commitments 7.1 40.0 2.5
8 Results re. operational emissions reduction: on-pace (performance-to-date) and momentum (forward-looking targets) 0.0 10.0 0.0
9 Results re. value chain emissions reduction: on-pace (performance-to-date) and momentum (forward-looking targets) 0.0 10.0 0.0
10 Implied Temperature Rating by MSCi 0.0 10.0 -7.5
Results 0.0 30.0 -7.5
Total19.1100.0-4.0


Despite our best efforts to report accurate data based on publicly-available information, some data may be wrong, inaccurate or outdated. If it is the case, please reach out and report the issues. Email


Score Details

Criteria Results 2024 Score 2023 Score Vs. 2023 2022 Score
Criteria 1 : Transparency on operational emissions (Scope 1 + 2)
Are S1+S2 figures publicly-disclosed for the last reporting year and the preceding period? yes 5.0 / 5.0 5.0 0.0 5.0
Are S1+S2 figures verified by a 3rd-party for the last reporting year? NC 0.0/ 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Criteria 2 : Transparency on value chain emissions (Scope 3)
Are the 15 categories fully or partly disclosed? NC 0.0 / 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Are S3 figures fully or partly verified by a 3rd-party for the last reporting year? NC 0.0 / 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Criteria 3 : Quality and Frequency of reporting
What is the latest CDP score (no later than the preceding year)? B- 7.0 / 10.0 6.0 1.0 6.0
How many interim reporting were provided between 2 reporting periods (GHG emissions only)?
Criteria 4 : Net Zero Commitments
Does the net 0 target include a statement of a generally-accepted net zero emission target by 2050? NC 0.0 / 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Does the net zero target include an intermediate target by 2030? 2032 0.0 / 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Does the net zero target include all the emissions? NC 0.0 / 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Criteria 5 : Target year for Net Zero Commitments
Target year for achieving net zero emissions for S1+S2? NC 0.0 / 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Target year for achieving net zero emissions for S1+S2+S3 combined? NC 0.0 / 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Criteria 6 : Reduction objectives
What is the forward-looking GHG% reduction (without compensation) for scope 1+2? 4.6
4.6 / 5.0 4.6 0.0 4.6
What is the forward-looking GHG% reduction (without compensation) for scope 1+2+3?
No target found
 0.0 / 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Criteria 7 : Science-Based Targets
What type of science-based target (as validated by SBTi) did the company commit to? Committed NA 2.5 / 10.0 0.0 2.5 0.0
Criteria 8 : Results based on scope 1 - 2
Performance to date: cumulative% reduction vs. target Objective (in %):
Actual (in %):
YTD reduction objective is not valid
 0.0 / 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Momentum: last year % reduction vs. forward-looking target Objective (in %): 4.6
Actual (in %): -1.9
0.0 / 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Criteria 9 : Results based on scope 1 - 2 - 3
Performance to date: cumulative% reduction vs. target Objective (in %):
Actual (in %):
No target found
 0.0 / 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Momentum: last year % reduction vs. forward-looking target Objective (in %):
Actual (in %):
No target found
 0.0 / 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Criteria 10 : Implied Temperature Rise (ITR)
Is the company aligned with global climate targets? ITR: None°C 0.0 / 10.0 7.5 -7.5 7.5
Total 19.1 / 100.0 23.1 -4.0 23.1


Available Data Sources

Reporting Year 2021 2021 2020 2020 2020 2020 2019 2019 2019
Source Public Yourstake Public CDP Public Yourstake Public CDP Public
Publication Year 2022 2023 2022 2021 2022 unknown 2022 2021 2022
Scope 1 155,974 155,974 141,040 116,774 116,770 116,770 138,341 127,679 127,680
Scope 2 - location-based 216,493 216,493 208,642 196,085 196,090 NA 198,220 186,196 186,200
Scope 2 - market-based 226,042 226,042 233,726 NA NA 196,090 219,166 NA NA
Scope 1-2 - location-based 372,467 372,467 349,682 312,859 312,860 116,770 336,561 313,875 313,880
Scope 1-2 - market-based 382,016 382,016 374,766 NA NA 312,860 357,507 NA NA
Scope 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total - location-based 372,467 372,467 349,682 312,859 312,860 116,770 336,561 313,875 313,880
Total - market-based 382,016 382,016 374,766 NA NA 312,860 357,507 NA NA

Sources

Please refer to the library for viewing the supporting documentation

Despite our best efforts to report accurate data based on publicly-available information, some data may be wrong, inaccurate or outdated. If it is the case, please reach out and report the issues. Email