NET 0 TrackerReduction and Net Zero Targets
>Note: intensity targets are not represented in the current version - see Methodology
Gross Absolute Emission Reductions
There is no absolute emission reduction recorded in our database. Email us to report missing information Email
Net Absolute Emission Reductions
There is no absolute emission reduction recorded in our database. Email us to report missing information Email
Net Zero Future Commitments
There is no net zero target recorded in our database. Email us to report missing information Email
Science-based Targets (SBTI)
Date Published / Updated :2022-03-24 01:00:00
| Near-term | Long-Term | Net Zero Standard |
|---|---|---|
| Targets set : 1.5°C by FY2030 | No target | No |
Workday, Inc. commits to continue annually sourcing 100% renewable electricity through FY2030. Workday, Inc. commits to reduce absolute scope 3 business travel GHG emissions 25% by FY2026 from a FY2020 base year. Workday, Inc. commits that 70% of its suppliers by spend covering purchased goods & services and capital goods will have science-based targets by FY2026.
Data source: SBTIOffsets
Last update for Workday by zerotracker.net: Sept. 4, 2024| Planning to use external offset credits | Yes |
| Separate targets for emission reductions and removals | Yes |
| Conditions on use of offset credits |
|
| Plans for carbon dioxide removal (CDR) | Yes (nature-based and CCS-based removals) |
Additional notes: "That’s why, as of today, we’ve also mitigated Workday’s entire carbon legacy (covering all our operational emissions before we reached our net-zero target in 2020) through the purchase of high-quality, third-party verified emission reductions, or carbon offsets. This means that Workday’s lifetime net carbon footprint is now zero, making us one of the first major companies to reach this milestone. We’re selective in purchasing high-quality carbon offset projects that not only have environmental benefits, but also have a social impact." https://blog.workday.com/en-us/2021/3-new-ways-workday-is-taking-action-against-climate-change.html 'And we offset 100% of our emissions from natural gas, data center cooling and business travel.' The company is investing in projects for carbon removal on a global scale (https://blog.workday.com/en-us/2021/3-new-ways-workday-is-taking-action-against-climate-change.html). Carbon Removal: • "While we continue to focus on our carbon management strategy of avoiding emissions, increasing efficiency, and utilizing carbon-free energy sources, we are also transitioning to permanent carbon removal to mitigate residual emissions to achieve long-term decarbonization" • "We joined Frontier alongside Autodesk, H&M Group, and JPMorgan Chase, contributing a combined $100 million in new funds to Frontier's $1B+ advance market commitment, which significantly: “Derisks” the development of needed technologies; Enables more companies to support durable carbon removal; Pushes carbon removal technologies to the next stages of development" (Workday 2024 Global Impact Report, pg. 34).
Score Summary
| Ref | Principle |
Score
(points) |
Max
(points) |
Delta
(points) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | At least 2 years of GHG emissions for scope 1 and 2 are publicly-available and externally-verified | 0.0 | 10.0 | - |
| 2 | Scope 3 emissions are fully reported and externally-verified | 0.0 | 10.0 | - |
| 3 | CDP score demonstrates the level of transparent disclosures | 0.0 | 10.0 | - |
| Transparency | 0.0 | 30.0 | - | |
| 4 | Net Zero Commitments by 2050 include an intermediate target and cover all the emissions | 0.0 | 10.0 | - |
| 5 | Net Zero targets demonstrate a high-level of emergency | 0.0 | 10.0 | - |
| 6 | Emission reduction targets on a forward-looking basis are ambitious | 0.0 | 10.0 | - |
| 7 | Targets are science-based as validated by SBTi | 10.0 | 10.0 | - |
| Commitments | 10.0 | 40.0 | - | |
| 8 | Results re. operational emissions reduction: on-pace (performance-to-date) and momentum (forward-looking targets) | 0.0 | 10.0 | - |
| 9 | Results re. value chain emissions reduction: on-pace (performance-to-date) and momentum (forward-looking targets) | 0.0 | 10.0 | - |
| 10 | Implied Temperature Rating by MSCi | 0.0 | 10.0 | - |
| Results | 0.0 | 30.0 | - | |
| Total | 10.0 | 100.0 | - |
Score Details
| Criteria | Results | 2024 Score | 2023 Score | Vs. 2023 | 2022 Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Criteria 1 : Transparency on operational emissions (Scope 1 + 2) | |||||
| Are S1+S2 figures publicly-disclosed for the last reporting year and the preceding period? | NC | 0.0 / 5.0 | - | ||
| Are S1+S2 figures verified by a 3rd-party for the last reporting year? | NC | 0.0/ 5.0 | - | ||
| Criteria 2 : Transparency on value chain emissions (Scope 3) | |||||
| Are the 15 categories fully or partly disclosed? | NC | 0.0 / 5.0 | - | ||
| Are S3 figures fully or partly verified by a 3rd-party for the last reporting year? | NC | 0.0 / 5.0 | - | ||
| Criteria 3 : Quality and Frequency of reporting | |||||
| What is the latest CDP score (no later than the preceding year)? | NONE | 0.0 / 10.0 | - | ||
| How many interim reporting were provided between 2 reporting periods (GHG emissions only)? | |||||
| Criteria 4 : Net Zero Commitments | |||||
| Does the net 0 target include a statement of a generally-accepted net zero emission target by 2050? | NC | 0.0 / 3.0 | - | ||
| Does the net zero target include an intermediate target by 2030? | NC | 0.0 / 3.0 | - | ||
| Does the net zero target include all the emissions? | NC | 0.0 / 4.0 | - | ||
| Criteria 5 : Target year for Net Zero Commitments | |||||
| Target year for achieving net zero emissions for S1+S2? | NC | 0.0 / 5.0 | - | ||
| Target year for achieving net zero emissions for S1+S2+S3 combined? | NC | 0.0 / 5.0 | - | ||
| Criteria 6 : Reduction objectives | |||||
| What is the forward-looking GHG% reduction (without compensation) for scope 1+2? | 0.0 / 5.0 | - | |||
| What is the forward-looking GHG% reduction (without compensation) for scope 1+2+3? |
No target found
|
0.0 / 5.0 | - | ||
| Criteria 7 : Science-Based Targets | |||||
| What type of science-based target (as validated by SBTi) did the company commit to? | Targets Set 1.5°C | 10.0 / 10.0 | - | ||
| Criteria 8 : Results based on scope 1 - 2 | |||||
| Performance to date: cumulative% reduction vs. target |
Objective (in %):
Actual (in %): The last reporting year could not be found
|
0.0 / 5.0 | - | ||
| Momentum: last year % reduction vs. forward-looking target |
Objective (in %):
Actual (in %): The last reporting year could not be found
|
0.0 / 5.0 | - | ||
| Criteria 9 : Results based on scope 1 - 2 - 3 | |||||
| Performance to date: cumulative% reduction vs. target |
Objective (in %):
Actual (in %): The last reporting year could not be found
|
0.0 / 5.0 | - | ||
| Momentum: last year % reduction vs. forward-looking target |
Objective (in %):
Actual (in %): The last reporting year could not be found
|
0.0 / 5.0 | - | ||
| Criteria 10 : Implied Temperature Rise (ITR) | |||||
| Is the company aligned with global climate targets? | ITR: None°C | 0.0 / 10.0 | - | ||
| Total | 10.0 / 100.0 | - | |||